Deprivation of liberty safeguards

Supporting you with concerns over a deprivation of liberty At a glance

•  Vulnerable people should be looked after in such a way that supports their inherent right to freedom from interference (Mental Capacity Act 2005)
• This applies to vulnerable people aged 18 or over who have a mental health condition and are unable to make decisions about their treatment
• If you are concerned that a family member, loved one, or someone you care for is being deprived of their liberty, we can represent and support you

If you care for or have a loved one that is a vulnerable person who is looked after in a hospital setting, residential care or supported living, then they must be looked after in such a way that supports their right to freedom from interference. There are provisions, known as Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), designed to ensure this is the case.

A deprivation of liberty could include:

• A patient being restrained
• Medication being given against a person’s will
• Carers making all decisions, including choices about assessments, treatment and visitors

It is unlawful to carry out an action that will deprive someone of their liberty without a formal authorisation from the local authority or relevant health board being in place.

A change in the law in 2015 means that anyone who is deemed to lack capacity to make decisions about their care setting must have the protection of am authorised DoLS in place. A failure to do so would result in that individual being unlawfully deprived of their liberty. If that care setting is not in a hospital or registered care home, only the Court of Protection has the power to authorise that placement for the next 12 months.

At Moore Blatch we can represent and support you if you are concerned about an individual, whether they are a family member or someone in your care and think that a deprivation of liberty has occurred without all appropriate authorisations in place. With a wealth of expertise, we are able to support you in ensuring that the individual’s right to freedom is not interfered with.