For the best experience on mobile, check out the Moore Blatch mobile app FREE

Get it on Google Play

023 8071 8000

Request a callback   |

Our people

023 8071 8000

or request a callback

Claire Haverfield

Contact Details

DD. 023 8071 6142
T. 023 8071 8000
F. 023 8071 8119
E. Email me
Download vCard
Gateway House
Tollgate, Chandler's Ford
Eastleigh
SO53 3TG

DX. 38507 SOUTHAMPTON 3

Claire Haverfield

Partner

Area of Expertise

  • Dispute resolution
  • Wills & inheritance disputes

I trained with a London firm and, upon qualification in 1996, stayed with the firm until I joined Moore Blatch in 2004. I became a partner in 2006.

I deal with all types of commercial disputes and have a great deal of experience in relation to contract disputes, and in particular, warranty claims and IT disputes. I also advise on claims against solicitors or other professionals who have been negligent.

I have acted in relation to a number of Intellectual Property disputes – copyright, patents, trade marks, passing off, and breach of confidence.

I also deal with disputes arising out of Wills, intestacy, and trusts. In particular, I advise in relation to claims against Executors/Trustees, Will validity disputes, and claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.

My clients want to know how they can achieve the best possible outcome. I give them plain-speaking advice on their options and the best way forward, and then support them through the process.

Memberships:

  • Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists
  • Professional Negligence Lawyers’ Association

Directory Quotes

Chambers UK 2014: "The team is well liked by clients. Strong in professional negligence, contentious trust work and disputes arising out of corporate transactions."

Legal 500 2013: "Team head Paul Whitaker is supported by Claire Haverfield and Mark Osgood, who are both noted for their professional negligence expertise."

Example cases

Commercial disputes:

  • Acting for a claimant in a dispute between former family, friends and business associates concerning an equitable mortgage. Our client was successful at first instance, and in the Court of Appeal.
  • Acting for a NASDAQ listed company, who was the claimant in proceedings for breach of warranty and fraudulent misrepresentation. The claim was for US$37.7m. The proceedings lasted 2 and a half years and necessitated the instruction of forensic computing and accounting experts before the parties settled after a successful mediation.
  • Representing two respondent IT supply companies in an arbitration (with Lord Mustill as arbitrator) concerning issues surrounding the supply of software. The matter settled at mediation.

Professional negligence:

  • Acting for claimants against solicitors who negligently drafted a share sale agreement. The case settled upon payment of a six-figure sum.
  • Acting for a liquidator against former directors and former auditors of an insolvent company. The case settled upon joint payment by the defendants of a six-figure sum.
  • Acting for a claimant against solicitors who failed to transfer a lease upon change of the claimant from a company to a trust. I resolved the problem, and then recovered the costs of doing so from the solicitors.

Intellectual property:

  • Dealing with a patent action relating to a mudguard manufacturing process. After a 4 day trial our client (the defendant) was successful.
  • Acting for a claimant in a copyright and breach of confidence action relating to cocoa crop forecast reports. The client won after a 2 day trial.
  • Representing the defendant to a patent action relating to support for a buoyancy element around a subsea pipe. Our client won at first instance and in the Court of Appeal.

Wills, inheritance and trusts

  • Defeating a challenge to the validity of my client's late mother's will (on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence) at an early stage in the court proceedings.
  • Achieving a settlement without the need for court proceedings for a client who had a claim against her late husband's estate under the inheritance (provision for family and dependants) act 1975.
  • Successfully applying on behalf of the deceased's children to remove an executor who had unreasonably delayed in administering the estate, and replace him with a partner in Moore Blatch so that the estate could be administered.

 

 

Return to profiles

Browse by surname

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z ALL

Browse again







Request a callback

All fields marked with an asterisk are mandatory